![]() ![]() The bill, AB 28 by Assemblyman Jesse Gabriel (D-Encino), needed a two-thirds majority vote and barely got it. The proposed state tax - first in the nation - would go toward anti-violence, school safety and law enforcement programs traditionally paid for by all beneficiaries. The federal tax pays for wildlife conservation. They note this tax has always been supported by the firearms industry. The bill’s advocates say the measure is modeled after a century-old federal excise tax - up to 11% - on arms and ammunition. It’s doubtful many criminals buy their weapons at gun stores anyway, so they wouldn’t be paying the tax. Newsom a record $156 million … in anti-violence programs uniquely suited to individual community needs.” He did it without raising taxes.īut if the Legislature and governor decide that more tax revenue is needed to enhance those programs, then they should hit up everyone - not just gun owners. In fact, the governor’s office recently bragged that “last year, Gov. Surely there’s enough money in the treasury to pay for such worthwhile efforts.Ĭalifornia Federal judge again overturns California ban on high-capacity gun magazinesĪ federal judge for the second time overturned California’s ban on large-capacity ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 bullets, ruling that it lacked a historical basis and is therefore unconstitutional. This year’s state budget is a record $311 billion. And all Californians should pay for them out of the state general fund. There’d be $75 million for local gun violence prevention programs and $50 million for school safety, plus millions more for law enforcement to seize firearms from convicted domestic abusers who have restraining orders.Īll Californians benefit from these programs - not just law-abiding hunters, skeet shooters and people worried about their own security. The money would go to some very good programs that have proved to be successful in reducing gun violence. The tax on firearms and ammunition would generate roughly $160 million annually. The resolution for the constitutional convention was adopted on a party-line vote in each house, both of which have Democratic super-majorities. The governor seems primarily interested in raising his national profile and raking in political donations. It would require ratification by three-fourths of the states. Anyway, in this political climate, Newsom has absolutely no chance of getting a constitutional amendment adopted that would strengthen gun control. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |